QAP Advocacy & Development Reforms

QAP Request/Comment #1

Background: For those who value communities with a mix of people of various incomes, ages and needs, or who seek to mitigate the negative influences of disinvestment or reinvestment activity over time, service-enriched, permanently affordable housing is a cornerstone resource.

Request/Comment: QAP applicants for affordable housing support should be awarded one extra point in scoring if they can demonstrate that their proposed project will be “permanently affordable”.

Further Context: Applicants including limited-equity coops, shared equity housing, projects subject to public or private 99-year lease or use restrictions, and community land trusts might be eligible for preferred scoring as long as they can demonstrate that affordability restrictions cannot be easily subordinated. Even as an incremental modification in scoring, this measure might spark dialogue in community development planning and programming.

QAP Request/Comment #2

Background: Affordable Housing property management is labor and cost-intensive work, made more difficult with compliance requirements and tenants needs for specialized services to keep them stable in their homes. When such services are delivered and paid by other means, property management benefits, and projects become more economically sustainable. Though DOH and IHDA recognize the need for this kind of funding, they concentrate on support of precisely defined acquisition, development and property management/building operations.

Request/Comment: QAP applicants could request property management fees of up to 10%. When requested, the differential would be allocated to select “Property Management Support Services” for affordable housing residents, provided by qualified staff, directly or via contract, that benefit property management with:

  • tenant communications and meetings;
  • triaged interventions to avert evictions and problem solve with tenants;
  • transition services to assist tenants with move-ins, transfers and move-outs; and
  • coordination of care support to facilitate communications with outside agencies providing support services to tenants.

Further Context: Such services would not take the place of  social service agency assistance, which tend to include traditional case management, clinical or non-clinical health and wellness programming, “wealth building” services and training, civic organizing and community engagement  activities – which should all be separately funded. For more background or examples of eligible services visit vophousing.com/property-management-support-services.